Ajitpal Singh v. State Of Punjab
!"#$!%&'&"( )*
*
+& ,-.&(/0 ***** ! & &"(!1 2!1'3'
. !"# 3(+4 *****!',"($!( 5 6*.. 7
!"
. 7 9* #$%& ' '
( () (*+ $, -, /-/%#$-01/- 2 +'#31%41545 #1%4/5 ' 10&&7 ## "8 4 5
#( *+ 6 ) 9( ' 000 ' 1-$ -$
("#) #"2##
8'
4#"<5 + ) 6 6 ) .,.%=%..> #'8 :)
+6) "#) :;
#"2 6 6 )6 = %- #'8#:) ) 6 "#) :; 6 ?? ) 6 8 #) '@2 9 "6
+ )
1$ /& 1- /-/1 86 :;
8 ) 6 6 6 6 ) ) *+
6) )
)
' #:) 8 () ( @6 ) ) # :) 8 1= 2)))
'( 6( )'
/,=10 /-/% @6 ))) ( 6 6
6 6 6 /.
)
'( 6( ) 8 ' 66 6 6 @ 6 6 6 ) /% -& /-/% ( 6
' ## A)
' 8 ())
6 6 "#) 69 () "#)
@ "#) :;
( + ( 6)8 6 ?( @ 6 "#) :;
)) )6 6("#) :; " + ) 6 " #) :; (
@ ) ) (
8 # (
( @ ) ) :
" #) 6 -& /-/% 6
) )) /.0=1/&>
+ )6( #) 8#"<'
A) #"2 + ))
6 # 1,1 ' '
6 )> ) = %-66 6 #'8#:) )
)) ..,$=&//> ))
#1%41545 6 #1/4/5
' 10&&6 /% 1- @
) A)2 ( 6 6 :
6) ( ) 6 )) ) 6 6 @ ) ) )( <
+"
/%&1/. :
45 ( ) 6 0,$,1 11=%0
+"6 ) +" #) 6(( 8 @ 6 )> ( )) ) 9>4#
5 ) 6 6) 6 B :
B 6 +"
66 6 @ )) ) 6 6 *#8 ) 9 )(
) @ 6 ( )) )( -, -1 /-/$ -0 -/ /-/$ /& -/ /-/$1.
-% /-/$
) @ ) ..,$=&//> ))
(
@ < ) )
*+ ) 9( ) )(6 6) ) ..,$=&//> ' "#) 6 6 ) !
) (
) ) ) !
6 6
+ ) )(
+"
/%&1/. :
45 ( ) 6 6 6 6) ( ) ( *#86 * ( (
)#$%&415' '
6
!
"
#
$
"
$
%
"
45
& "
45 $ $ &
&
' &
$
() 6 ( @B # '
!6 )) ( '6 ( ( @6 (6 ) (
) 6 *(+
&
&
&
$
( ,
#
#
$ & $
( -
( .
$ /
" 0
$ ( .
$ $ $
$ &
( .
/
#
# 1
$ $ $ 2
$
# $
( . $
!
( 3& ! 456 * ! 7 566 $
$ ! 849 $
! 8*4 ( +
( : #
( $
$
#
( @B# '
"
# $%& %
%
5( -+
0
0 $ $ $
! 8*9 ( + #
$ $
( !
$
# $ $
( ; $
( .
$ &
( .
$
$ # $
( )() ( () ( 6 (66 6( ' /.
Weighing the facts of the case on the anvil of the law settled, it is apparent that the complicity of the petitioner has been prima facie established. Thus, granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage would scuttle the ongoing investigation.
@B# ' ' ( )# " *' !
!$& $ #
"& + (
) ) B'
)'B
+6
9 ( ) ( ( ()
6 ) C
:. 7;
)*
*
( )> E> E>