Raj Kumar v. State Of Haryana




    
    

 Date of decision: 29th October, 2015  Raj Kumar

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.

 !
"#  $ Allegations against the petitioner Raj Kumar in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No.228 dated 29.06.2015 registered at Police Station Bhondsi, District Gurgaon under Sections 323/326/452/506/34 IPC, are that on 27.06.2015 petitioner and the injured complainant Virender @ Doli had an altercation. It is alleged that the petitioner armed with a Kassi had given a single blow on the head of the complainant which is opined to be grievous in nature.

Contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Vivek Salathia, Advocate that the petitioner is in custody since 06.07.2015, for almost 3 months, and that the trial is not likely to RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.29 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   conclude in near future, could not be controverted by learned State counsel.

Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner coupled with the fact that the trial will take a long time to conclude, this Court is of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner in the present case is not warranted. Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. The present petition stands disposed off accordingly. #  !
$   %&'()"


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.29 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court