Ravi v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-30703 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-30703 of 2016 Date of Decision: 06.9.2016 Ravi ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 124 dated 21.5.2016 registered at Police Station Farrukh Nagar, District Gurgaon under Sections 323, 342, 366-A, 506, 34 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act. Petitioner is in custody since 31.5.2016. Charge has been framed. Case is fixed for prosecution evidence in November 2016. The FIR was lodged after two days. There is no name in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In the FIR the allegations were that the petitioner was driving the vehicle. A certificate has been placed during the course of proceedings wherein the date of birth of the prosecutrix is written as 16.7.1997 and the petitioner alleges that the prosecutrix was major. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take time to conclude, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.09.07 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-30703 of 2016 -2local surety and adequate bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE September 06, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.09.07 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh