High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2988/2017allowed

Raman @ Rajkumar Madan And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

2017-04-20Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-2988 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-2988 of 2017 Date of decision : 20.04.2017 Raman @ Raj Kumar Madan and ors.

......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Shashi Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No. 218 dated 26.03.2013 under Sections 406/498-A/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Gurgaon City, District Gurgaon, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 10.12.2016 (Annexure P-2) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 10.03.2007. Out of this wedlock, two male children were born. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioners on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the basis of compromise deed dated 10.12.2016 (Annexure P-2). In compliance of order dated 31.01.2017, report dated GAURAV ARORA 2017.04.25 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-2988 of 2017 08.03.2017 of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurugram has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of the complainant and joint statement of petitioners have been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 have also filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 08.03.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 218 dated 26.03.2013 under Sections 406/498-A/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Gurgaon City, District Gurgaon, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

20.04.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.04.25 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh