Satish v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-29893 of 2017 Date of Decision: 16.11.2017 Satish

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. AG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrested in another case, in which complaint was filed for offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, as such, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 16, 2017 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.11.16 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH