High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/29975/2017disposed of

Kartar Singh And ORS. v. State Of Punjab

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29975-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.11.2017 Kartar Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr.Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. A.S. Dhaiwal, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.145 dated 09.06.2017 under Sections 379/448/436/427/511/354-B/323/325/149 IPC (Sections 436 & 325 of IPC added lateron), registered at Police Station Sadar Ferozepur, District Ferozepur.

This Court was pleased to pass the following order on 02.08.2017 :- "At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition qua Kartar Singh alias Titu - petitioner No.1.

Notice of motion qua petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 for 17.11.2017.

Connect with CRM-M-28001-2017.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 be released on interim bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 shall join the investigation as and when called upon to Satyawan 2017.11.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-29975-2017 -2do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C."

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 have joined the investigation and they are not required for investigation any further.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the aforesaid fact.

Since the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 have joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 18.08.2017 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioners will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

17.11.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.11.21 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh