Jai Parkash And ANR. v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-3085-2016 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3085-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 20.10.2016 Jai Parkash and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in a case arising out of FIR No.865 dated 06.11.2015, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Gurgaon, who have been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 506 and 354-A IPC.

Vide order dated 01.06.2016, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre to enable the petitioners to settle the disputes with the complainant and the parties were directed to appear before the mediation centre of this Court on 12.07.2016. As per the report of the mediator, the Naresh Kumar 2016.10.24 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh parties have not been able to resolve their disputes.

CRM-M-3085-2016 (O&M) -2In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 29.01.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners is made absolute. The petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. October 20, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.10.24 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh