Khem Singh v. State Of Haryana




    
      Date of decision: 19th November, 2015  Khem Singh

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. M.R. Verma, Advocate for the complainant.

 
!"

# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Khem Singh in case FIR No.408 dated 14.07.2015 registered at Police Station City Rohtak under Sections 4987A/406 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the orders of interim bail dated 04.09.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigations which is not controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    Parkash Chand who submits that the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In view of what has been stated above and in the light of orders passed earlier, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 04.09.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. "

 
#   $%&'%( ! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court