← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/14497/2026disposed of

Rakesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2026-04-09Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.14497 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.04.2026 RAKESH KUMAR

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Ms. Sudesh Rani, Advocate and Ms. Tanveer Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (ORAL) 1.

The instant petition under Section 482 of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.26 dated 07.02.2026, under Sections 204, 308(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) BNS (erstwhile Sections 170, 384, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC) registered at Police Station Quilla Panipat, District Panipat.

2.

This Court vide order dated 17.03.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 17.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Sandeep NEETU RANI 2026.04.09 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

CRM-M No.14497 of 2026 -2Kumar, does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. 5.

In view of the above, the order dated 17.03.2026 is made absolute.

6.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 7.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 09.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.09 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD