Jummal v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-30011 of 2017 Date of Decision: 18.08.2017 Jummal ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 159 dated 8.8.2015, registered under Sections 148, 149, 307, 506, 452, 427 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Nagina.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner was earlier appearing in the trial Court; because of his non-appearance on a single date, his bail was cancelled and non-bailable warrants of arrest were ordered to be issued against him.

Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perusal of the record, on 1.6.2017, five prosecution witnesses were present; they were to be examined and the petitioner failed to put in appearance before the learned trial Court. As per order dated 3.10.2016, passed by this Court in CRM-M-23871-2016, directions were issued to the learned trial Court to conclude the prosecution evidence by Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.08.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-30011 of 2017 2.2.2017 and in these circumstances, the learned Court below passed the order dated 20.7.2017 as the petitioner misused the concession of bail. Thus, no case is made out to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner and the present petition stands dismissed.

(Shekher Dhawan) Judge August 18, 2017 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.08.18 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document