Parminder Singh Deo v. State Of Punjab & ORS

CRM-M-30109-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30109-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 15, 2015 Parminder Singh Deo

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. R.S. Khosla, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Reeta Kohli, Senior Advocate-cumAdditional Advocate General, Punjab, with Mr. Hanspal Virk, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from SI Harvinder Singh of CIA Staff, Nabha, submits that at present the petitioner is nominated as an accused in FIR PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.16 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-30109-2015 (O&M) No. 241, dated 17.12.2013, for the offences punishable under Sections 21, 22, 25 and 25-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station, Sadar, Patiala. She further submits that the petitioner has been declared as a proclaimed offender in the said case. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 - Joint Director, Enforcement Directorate, Jalandhar Zonal Office, Punjab, submits that since the Punjab Police has registered a case against the petitioner, therefore, Enforcement Directorate has also initiated an inquiry and, prima facie, the inquiry shows involvement of the petitioner.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.

Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE October 15, 2015 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.10.16 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document