Lachhman Singh v. Gp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (202) RSA-3530-2000(O&M) Date of Decision:-05.09.2025 Lachhman Singh ......Appellant

Versus

Gram Panchayat ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for the appellant.

Ms. Meenu Mumtaj, Advocate, for Mr. Dhirender Kamal Saldi, Advocate, for the respondent.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

Mr. Dhirender Kamal Saldi, Advocate, put in his appearance on behalf of respondent and filed his power of attorney. The same is taken on record.

2.

As per the office report, the sole appellant has expired. No effort has been made in the last many years to bring on record the legal representatives of sole appellant and even today, no one put appearance on behalf of sole appellant.

3.

In light of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the LRs of appellant to seek its revival, in case, any cogent cause of action survives.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 05.09.2025 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2025.09.08 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order