Union Of India Through Secretary v. Armed Forces Tribunal Through Registrar
!"
#$%$!& '
)#* +,
&$!& !"
&-$
&- ! * )% ..
$ $!& )% / )%0% )1 - !)# % )$20& 3, * &-$4 )*
&-
&! * ) ..
%5!&- & % ('
67 (.
8 8 (
8
67 (.
8 ( 7
8 (
8
.
7
!
"#$ %&
#)
* , -
"
. &
/
" &
!
)
3 #
45 6 #
7 4 6
7
))
8
'
9 : )
)
8
')
) 8 "&
;; !% 0
)
) ) )(
(
)
=
'
#)( 5 75;
4 ; 0
)
;
%
9 ( "9&
4 ; 7
) 9 4 4
!
)
( ) !
9 !
+
$
) >
'
) !
)
(
+ (
)
9 ( "9& !
)
)
' - #)
*
)
)
(
$
learned counsel for the petitioners has conceded the fact that the issue raised in the present petition was decided in favour of No.2 on the basis of the judgment in Shama Kaur's case (supra), wherein the similar relief had already been granted and which judgment has already attained finality upto Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the said judgment stands implemented. * -
9
0 0 !
) '
'
7.
As for the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that operation of judgment passed by the Delhi High Court, granting benefit of condonation in qualifying service, by relying upon judgment in Shama Kaur's case (supra), has been stayed, it should be noted that the decision of the :<'
!
8 "&
;; !% 0
( '(
) >
3
)
(
>
(
(
'
?
(
)
'
!
"#$ %&
+
)
(
8 (
8
)#* +,
( 7
= > @
A = '