Mosahid Khan v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15700 of 2026 Date of decision: 30.04.2026 Mosahid Khan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate and Ms. Siddhi Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab.

***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition under Section 482 BNSS (corresponds to Section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.308 dated 28.11.2025, under Sections 326(g), 194(2), 324(4), 126(2), 191(2), 190, 351(3), 115(2) and 61(2) of BNS (corresponding Sections 434, 160, 427, 341, 147, 149, 506, 323 and 120-B IPC) registered at Police Station Division No.7, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana.

2.

This Court vide order dated 02.04.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 02.04.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. NEETU RANI 2026.05.01 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

CRM-M No.15700 of 2026 -24.

Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in the present case.

5.

In view of the above, the order dated 02.04.2026 is made absolute.

6.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 7.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 30.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.05.01 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD