← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30251/2017allowed

Rani Masih v. State Of Haryana

2017-10-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-30251-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-30251 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 24, 2017 Rani Masih ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. S.S. Momi, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.475 dated 20.09.2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, which is still in progress but her custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-30251-2017 -2order dated 18.08.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against her so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 24, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.10.24 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh