Rinku v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-30226 of 2015 .....

Date of decision:21.9.2015 Rinku

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.230 dated 31.5.2015 (Annexure-P.1) registered for the offences under Sections 409 and 420 IPC at Police Station Indri, District Karnal.

Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana appearing for the HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.09.22 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-30226 of 2015 [2] respondent-State and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that FIR in the present case has been registered on the basis of a secret information that at about 12 O'clock in the night of 29.5.2015, Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Indri, informed that water was being sprayed on the wheat store of P.R. Centre, Indri. As per the prosecution version, the present petitioner along with Yogesh, both Sub Inspectors fled from the spot.

The present petitioner is in custody since 26.6.2015. He is no more required for any interrogation and investigation purposes as he is in judicial custody. Nothing is to be recovered from him. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

September 21, 2015.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.09.22 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh