Tarsem Lal v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-30294-2017 Date of decision: 21.08.2017 Tarsem Lal ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

In the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner, at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset contends that the purpose of the instant petition would be achieved, if respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, is directed to decide the representation dated 12.05.2017 (Annexure P-1) moved by the petitioner, before respondent No. 2-Inspector General of Police, Patiala Zone, Patiala, a copy of which has also been sent to respondent No. 3. 3.

In view of the above, respondent No. 3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, is directed to look into the matter and decide the representation dated 12.05.2017 (Annexure P-1), moved by the petitioner, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to him within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

The instant petition stands disposed of, accordingly. August 21, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.08.22 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document