High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18107/2022disposed of

Sarupa v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2022-11-21Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Verma2 pages

CRM-M-18107-2022 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-18107-2022 Date of Decision: 21.11.2022 Sarupa .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present: - None for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for issuance of a direction to respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police Kaithal, to restrain respondents No. 4 to 7 from adopting any illegal means by threatening the petitioner and forcefully trying to take illegal possession of his self acquired land measuring 14 acres.

Short reply dated 14.07.2022, filed by way of affidavit of Sh. Sajjan Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kalayat, on behalf of respondent-State, is taken on record.

In para No. 2 of the said reply, it has been averred that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the petitioner had suffered a statement that 'they have reached into a compromise and he did not want any action on his complaint'. Copies of the statement of the RISHU KATARIA 2022.11.22 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-18107-2022 -2petitioner, compromise and police enquiry report are annexed as Annexures R-1 to R-3, respectively.

In view of the above facts as mentioned in para 2 of the reply, no further action is required to be taken in the instant petition and the same is disposed of, accordingly.

November 21, 2022 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2022.11.22 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment