Dharam Singh v. Sardara Singh Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (209) RSA-1102-1999(O&M) Date of Decision:-23.04.2026 Dharam Singh ......Appellant

Versus

Sardara and Another ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

Mr. K.G. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Hari Om Sharma, Advocate, and Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, and Ms. Sunita Rani, Advocate, for the respondent.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

As per the report of the Registry, the notice issued to the sole appellant has been received back with the report that he has expired. 2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite repeated efforts, he has been unable to establish contact with the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. Even today, learned counsel expresses his inability to proceed further in the matter due to lack of instructions or communication from the legal representatives of the appellant.

3.

In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution, with liberty to the legal representatives of the appellant to seek revival of the appeal, in accordance with law, in case any sufficient cause survives.

4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 23.04.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2026.04.24 12:11 I am the author of this document

SHUBHAM 2026.04.24 12:11 I am the author of this document