(O&M) Bikram Singh Etc. v. Pritam Singh Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 115 of 1999 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 22.12.2025 Bikram Singh and others ...Appellants

Versus

Pritam Singh and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Ms. Daarika Sikka, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Chopra, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 1. *** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for the appellants is unable to establish contact with the appellants, so the order dated 18.11.2025 could not be complied with and even cost could not be deposited. It seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal.

2.

In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 3.

Since the main appeal stands decided, the miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 22.12.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2025.12.23 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment