Rajiv Gaddh v. State Of Haryana & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31348-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.12.2022 Rajiv Gaddh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & Another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana Mr. Tanvir Singh Grewal, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that as on date no proceeding is pending against the petitioner, thus, she wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if respondent-investigating officer at a later stage intends to implicate the petitioner.

On instruction from SI Om Parkash, learned State counsel does not dispute afore-stated fact.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 12.12.2022 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.12 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment