Vijay Kumar v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-30576 of 2017 Date of Decision: 27.10.2017 Vijay Kumar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for respondents no. 5 to 9.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that private respondents in this case have joined the investigation and have been allowed anticipatory bail. The FIR was originally registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 148 and 149 IPC and on receipt of medical report the offence punishable under Section 326 IPC was also added. Investigation is in progress but has been held up as it is a cross-version case and the petitioner and all other accused named in the cross-version case have not joined the investigation so far. There is no lapse on the part of police to delay filing the challan.

Counsel for the petitioner has not appeared to rebut the submissions of learned State counsel.

In view of submission of learned State counsel, the instant petition is dismissed.

October 27, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.10.27 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH