Urmila v. State Of Haryana
KAPIL 2015.09.02 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM-M-3058-2015 Date of Decision: 02.09.2015 Urmila ........Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present:
Mr. Deepender Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Doon, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rajeev Kawatra, Advocate, for the complainant.
***** SABINA, J.
Learned State counsel has submitted that only one prosecution witness remains to be examined i.e. Investigating Officer and has further assured that every effort will be made to examine the Investigating Officer on the date fixed i.e. 11.09.2015.
Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
September 02, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE