High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/31482/2016allowed

Parmod v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-14Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-31482-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31482-2016 Date of Decision:- 14.09.2016 Parmod ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Present petition is for release of petitioner on regular bail in FIR No.101 dated 16.04.2016, under Sections 323, 342, 366, 346 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Rai, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegations contained in the FIR the complainant's daughter had left her house without telling to anyone. He further submits that as per marriage certificate and photograph (Annexurs P-1 & P-2), the petitioner had performed marriage with the daughter of the complainant, who was major at that time.

Learned State counsel has not disputed the above-said fact. In a statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC (Annexure P-9), she has supported the version of the FIR. The charges in the present case Naresh Kumar 2016.09.19 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-31482-2016 -2have already been framed and now out of total 9 witnesses, 5 has since been examined.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record. The petitioner was arrested on 16.04.2016. Since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. The final conclusion of trial will take a long time. In view of above facts, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge/Duty Magistrate, Sonepat.

Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect, on merits in the trial of the main case, in any manner. September 14, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.09.19 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh