Kulwant Singh And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And Another

  
    
  

!"  "#$%$&' 
 

           
'( )*
 +  
     

 
 

         !  "

  +  ,)-'

#   $%"&

'()*+ ,-- - "."/ /0$/"/ 0.1/$)
&
  !2 + # +  3
 45
6-7

'  2"8 / "."/45
6"7 2 petitioners and the complainant to settle their disputes in question.

"

                    2   2         )

'  9  &       -/ $ "."/ 
 % "."/   3

:    +     (   ;;        

  22    #      

/

<       + "6    

'()* 

$

)    &) 



   ".-"4-.7 &&/./   

   

    4".-870 &&1%%  2             '2    

    The power is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone. On similar lines is another judgment of the Supreme Court in Shiji v. Radhika, 2012 (1) SCC (Criminal) 101, wherein criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 354 and 394 IPC were quashed since the parties had entered into a compromise and there were no chances of conviction.

(  (

=  &
   

      "..,4/7* * 4& 7-.0"    2  &52     $%"  &    

2        6 

         '           22

 #2  



 

()*2

 

  

  '  & 5  $%"&  2

2  #   #

   > 2

   2  

  2 

  2

    5               2

 5   ,

&'         

2  ()*  + ,   -- - "."/ /0$/"/0.1/$)
&
 

  !2   +   #  +   3 
     

'  '! 

, +  -     Aw ?9 @9+ ?

 @9+