Sunny Kumar v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M No. 18271 of 2022 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 18271 of 2022 Reserved on 28.07.2022 Pronounced on: 16.09.2022 Sunny Kumar ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. R.S. Sekhon, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** ANOOP CHITKARA J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 22.11.2019 City Nawanshahar Distt.

406, 420 IPC and section 13 of SBS Nagar Punjab Travel Professionals Act, The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.

During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2. 3.

After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. 4.

On 31.5.22, the aggrieved person Mang Gurparshad (R-2) appeared before the JMIC, Shaheed Bhagat Nagar and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 14.6.22, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat. ANALYSIS & REASONING:

SONIA ARORA 2022.09.19 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No. 18271 of 2022 --2-- 5.

However, the petitioners did not arraign the aggrieved Rajwinder as a respondent in this case.

6.

Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.

7.

Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine the complainant Mang Gurparshad and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements alongwith report would suffice.

Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.09.2022 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

SONIA ARORA 2022.09.19 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document