← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15473/2025allowed

Ranjit Singh v. State Of Haryana

2025-05-06Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-15473-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15473 of 2025 Date of decision: 06.05.2025 Ranjit Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

 *** H.S. Grewal, J. (Oral) This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, (BNSS), 2023 in case bearing FIR No.337 dated 15.12.2024 under Sections 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Ding, District Sirsa.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been named as an accused in the aforementioned FIR. It has been alleged that the petitioner alongwith the co-accused had accepted an amount of Rs.95,000/- on the pretext of sending the sister of the complainant to Canada for higher education on behalf on agency named "Dream to Destination Agency". Counsel for the petitioner further submits that an amount of Rs.95,000/- was credited in the account of Poonam who is running the Agency. It is further stated that since the file/ case of the complainant's sister was rejected, an affidavit was given by Poonam wife of Gurpreet Singh admitting receiving of the amount and further assuring that she will return the same.

3.

This Court, vide order dated 21.03.2025, had directed the petitioner Sonia Puri 2025.05.06 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-15473-2025 -2to appear before the Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on ad-interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

4.

Learned State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner especially when the petitioner having joined investigation, the order dated 21.03.2025 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. 6.

However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. He shall also join investigation as and when called upon to do so.

7.

The petition stands allowed.

(H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE 06th May, 2025 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.05.06 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document