Arvind Sharma @ Nind v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-30654-2017 Date of decision: 22.08.2017 Arvind Sharma @ Nind ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. PL Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of ad interim bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 71 dated 27.05.2014 registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Bilga, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on account of non-appearance of the petitioner on 13.07.2017, his bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited to the State by cancelling his bail and he was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants. 3.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, but without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on 07.09.2017, the date already fixed in the trial and would be admitted to ad interim bail subject to his furnishing appropriate bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. However, it is clarified that this order shall not be an embargo in conducting the proceedings against the petitioner under Section 446 Cr.P.C., by the trial Court.

4.

The instant petition stands disposed of, accordingly. August 22, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.08.22 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No