Bajrang Singh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-30656 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-30656 of 2017 Date of Decision: 20.9.2017 Bajrang Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA

Present:

Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

**** HARI PAL VERMA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 122 dated 29.3.2017 under Sections 3, 4, 5, 13 and 13-B of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015, registered at Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh (Annexure P-1).

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated August 22, 2017 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Head Constable Sajjan Singh, does not dispute the aforesaid fact and states that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is no more required at this stage. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.09.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh custodial interrogation is no more required, the present petition is allowed

CRM-M-30656 of 2017 -2and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 22.08.2017 is made absolute.

However, if required, the petitioner shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (HARI PAL VERMA) JUDGE September 20, 2017 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2017.09.20 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh