High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30764/2014dismissed

Pankaj Goswami & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ANR

2015-04-30Mr. Justice S.C. Datta1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30764 of 2014 Date of decision: 30.04.2015 Pankaj Goswami and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Gaurav Gogna, Advocate, for Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Mehta, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as charges have already been framed against the petitioners on 14.10.2014.

Dismissed as infructuous. Petitioners will be at liberty to challenge the framing of charges.

(Paramjeet Singh) Judge April 30, 2015 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.04.30 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document