Harjinder Kumar @ Chintu v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 16128 of 2020 Date of Decision: 23.6.2020 Harjinder Kumar @ Chintu ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 40 dated 7.3.2019, registered under Sections 307/450/323/427/148/149 IPC and Section 25/27/30 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Canal Colony, Bathinda, District Bathinda. Notice of motion.

At this stage, Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

Learned State counsel has pointed out that there are some flaws in the translation of the FIR.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better translation.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE June 23, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2020.06.23 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh