Darshan Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP-7878-2024 -12024:PHHC:047104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7878-2024 Date of Decision : 08.04.2024 DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab in CWP No.2371 of 2010 and Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP No.9936 of 2017. 3.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this Court, the respondents-authorities in the case of various officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of judgments of this Court in Harbans Anju Goel 2024.04.08 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-7878-2024 -22024:PHHC:047104
Lal and Sukhjit Singh (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.

4.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of.

08.04.2024 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.04.08 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh