← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/31631/2016dismissed

Gurmeet Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

2016-09-07Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31631-2016 Date of decision: 07.09.2016 Gurmeet Kaur & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab & Ors.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. A.S. Rattniya, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to protect their lives and liberty and to provide adequate security to protect them from respondent Nos. 4 to 8, who are parents, brother and relatives of petitioner No.1. The petitioners, who are present in Court today, have solemnized marriage with their own consent in accordance with law. The private respondents are not accepting the marriage of the petitioners and are extending threats to them. Copy of matriculation examination of petitioner No.1 (Annexures P-1), Copy of passport of petitioner No.2 (Annexure P-2), Marriage certificate (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and photographs of marriage (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners have been placed on record.

After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach Senior Superintendent of Police Barnala and S.H.O. Police Station Dhanaula, District Barnala for protection to their lives and liberty and to provide adequate security to protect them from respondent Nos. 4 to 8. Satyawan 2016.09.

CRM-M-31631-2016 -2Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach Senior Superintendent of Police Barnala and S.H.O. Police Station Dhanaula, District Barnala for protection to their lives and liberty within 7 days from today, who, after their satisfaction that the petitioners are actually facing threat, shall take necessary steps to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from private respondent Nos.4 to 8, as per law. However, it is made clear that this order, in no way, will affect any other proceedings pending or to be filed against the petitioners etc., which are to be dealt with independently as per law. 07.09.2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) sp JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2016.09.07 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh