Sohit Bhadana And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
!"# $!%%&% %& %&#!'
( )
*) +
#%#'
, !%-%&% %& %&#!' .
%
!&/$0'
12 #"'
!%(''# 3%2 1''4%& Present :
Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***** !%(''# 3%2 1''4%&
%0
!"##$ ##%#&
'(
" )*
#$)&+,)--)-)%#$
( ( .
/
!. (
(
.
"+
"+.
( . (
0 -###
.1) ( ( . . $
(
!) .2
2
) .
3
". (
3 ( ( .
"
2 2
.
1 3
!
4,
5 +6
(
(
(
" 7
!
- -##-) .
.
3 +
9 :+
!!"# !!$!#%& !"&%'(&))&)$!"
*+
& ,-(. '#/ +& , + + 0, ,1 !!)!) -(.'/ + 2 + 3
& 4 5 (0 6& 75&
,
#' 2 60 & (0
,
,5 0+ + 8
, 945 2 !!$!)5 0 & + 1 + +
9452
,+ , .
5
+ + + :
945 2
1 +:
#* 5 & +
5 * 5 +
90 5& +
5 )* 005 + * 5 ,
+
945 2
;, .&&!!)< , #;##- < (
1 3) = <
) )
(
(
+
"2 " (8
> (
( (
2
3.
3
3
-
(?(
( ( 3 % Learned State counsel upon instructions from ASI Sarita has confirmed this fact that during the investigation, accused Sandeep, Munesh, Jai Kumar and Subhash were found to be innocent and challan was presented only against the present petitioners namely Sohit Kumar and Ashok Kumar. $ > @,5
2 2
7
2
)
. (
. ( ( ;
. (
(
.
2
(3( 3
( (
32 2
) )
.
!
7
) (
2
3)
. ! "##$ ##%#&
'(
" )*
#$)&+,)--)-)%#$
(
( )
& ,
(
6) 3)
!%(''# 3%2 1''4%&
126'
9
' 1
? A ?" Whether reportable Yes/No