Jatinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another




   

 



 

  
 
     

!"#$%&"#' (%""

#%& )%&*+* !% ,(+#-!./!# %& %*0 #$%#*
1 23


 
1 1




 Present : Mr. Ashok Kumar Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Aulakh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manoj Kumar Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.2.





   
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.64 dated 11.04.2014 registered under Sections 498.A and 494 IPC at Police Station Sadar Amritsar and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P.2) arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from learned District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned Sessions Judge has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned Sessions Judge has also sent statements of parties and compromise deed.

RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.22 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


 

  



Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioner is the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in




    

      



!

"#, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $





      

"

"

 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioner(s).

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

  



 

  

  

  

  
   
RAJ KUMAR 2016.01.22 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document