Mohan Lal v. State Of Punjab





 


    
  

   


   






!"

"#$%$ & '('



  

     

     

  ) * ' +
  + +  

   
 
    

   

 
 

  !

 "

#     + +  , ' -. /0 $ %    



   

&'(  !  !              

  )*+ $,- 

$. $- ,-$(  

&,-* !





   

 

"

  + ,   /

"

 

  /

, It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present case the petitioner is in custody for about ten months and the investigation of the case has already been completed and thereafter the report under Section 173  

! !     has been presented to the competent Court. He submitted that it is a case which is triable by a Magistrate and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case because he was earlier involved in two more cases. 0 

         1 /  



   

DINESH 2023.07.27 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document





  


  

 may be considered for the grant of regular bail. 3.

On the other hand,
 

  !

   "

#   has stated that it is correct that the petitioner has already faced incarceration for about ten months and after the completion of the investigation, challan has been presented to the competent Court. He has however opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that he is involved in two more cases. 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

It is a case where the petitioner has already faced incarceration for about ten months and the present is a case which is triable by a Magistrate and the investigation of the case has already been completed. The mere fact that the petitioner was earlier involved in two more cases would not disentitle the petitioner for grant of regular bail. ! 2  1 the present petition is allowed.

% 

           2   1  



     3

1   



       ! 3" 1
  

    .

04

 1    

 



    



5     

    1      

      

  - + + 0   1/2 , 

     6

  /   3+ 6

   

 3+ DINESH 2023.07.27 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document