Satnam Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others
!
"
# $
% & '
(&)
$
% * &
( &+( !
" % ,#
- (&)
$ . !"
# /
$
)0 - $
"
0
&
0 1 2
3 -
$ $
$ '
$
$ &
4+
35(% $ 0 0(6 $
! 7 8 -
!
"+)
4&
5:
(
$ $ '
"
-
$
$ '-
$
0
)
-
0$ '
-"' &$ 0( 8 00
0
-
$$0 "0
00- (,#& 00
"0 00-
- 00
$
4&
5 ) "'
$
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner is decided by NEHA 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
$%&'(%'( %% respondents No.2 & 4 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.
Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice as well as counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that they have no objection in case a direction is issued to respondents No.2 & 4 for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 4.
Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents No.2 & 4 are directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled
0
(
00"
-
"'
respondents No.2 & 4
$ ( 0' " #
)''(
$
*
;
1.
$
"0 ;
1. NEHA 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh