← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30859/2017disposed of

Sonia And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2017-08-23Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-30859 of 2017 Date of Decision: 23.08.2017 Sonia and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Both the petitioners are present in the Court and are identified by their counsel.

Petitioners have sought protection of their lives and liberty, inter alia, taking the plea that they performed the marriage with each other, whereas private respondents are not accepting their marriage and now they are apprehending danger to their lives and liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners performed marriage on 18.8.2017.

Petitioners have also taken the plea that they are major and have performed their marriage with free will.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Ms. Neelam Kashyap, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, who is present in the Court, accepts Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.08.23 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-30859 of 2017 notice on behalf of respondents No. 5 to 8 and filed his power of attorney. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and perusal of record, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Hisar, is directed to consider the representation dated 18.8.2017 (Annexure P5) and issue necessary orders, as warranted by law, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.

However, it is also made clear that this order shall not be taken to validate the alleged marriage of the petitioners or entitle them for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings, if they are found involved in the commission of any cognizable offence. In case, the petitioners had committed any offence, the law will take its own course.

With the aforesaid observations made and directions issued, the present petition stands disposed of.

(Shekher Dhawan) Judge August 23, 2017 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.08.23 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document