Rukshar & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-3088 of 2017 Date of decision : January 31, 2017 Rukshar and another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners Both the petitioners in person Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. A copy of the paper book be handed over to him.

Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate, for has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 to 6. Respondents no. 4 to 6 are also present in person.

Though on behalf of the private respondents, opposition has been laid to the relief being sought by the petitioners, however, keeping in view that the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India have been created solely for protecting life and personal liberty of human beings and thus, in the light of the same, the present petition stands disposed off with direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-4) within the framework of law. Meanwhile, in Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.01.31 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-3088 of 2017 -2case any instance of threat is brought to the notice of the police by the petitioners, they will act into it expeditiously, in accordance with law. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) January 31, 2017 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2017.01.31 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.