Rajinder Singh @ Rajender Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17783-2024 Date of decision: August 8th, 2024 Rajinder Singh @ Rajender Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Ishan Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated 10.04.2024 and thereafter, again vide order dated 09.05.2024, the parties had been directed to get their respective statements recorded with respect to the compromise purportedly affected between them.

2.

As per report received from learned JMIC, Ambala, none appeared on behalf of the complainant to get their statement recorded with respect to the compromise stated to have been affected between the parties.

3.

Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate, has entered appearance on behalf of the private respondents and filed his power of attorney after obtaining NOC from the previous counsel, which is taken on record. He has submitted that there is no compromise in existence between the parties and that is the reason why the complainant/private respondents did not appear before the learned JMIC to record their statements. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.08.08 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-17783-2024 -24.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, in the wake of the submissions made by the complainant/private respondents, does not press the instant petition.

5.

Dismissed as not pressed.

August 8th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.08.08 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh