Satish Goyal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-31799 of 2016 Date of decision : November 28, 2016 Satish Goyal ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. RS Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent Mr. RS Randhawa, Advocate, for the complainant Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Manoj Kumar, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and that only the question of receipt and its issuance is subject matter of contention though Mr. RS Randhawa, counsel for the complainant, has sought to oppose the stand of the State. However, keeping in view his admission that it is a receipt purported to have been issued by the concerned post office being a public document, veracity of which can be easily verified during the course of investigation and there is no need of custodial interrogation, impels this Court to make interim order dated 9.9.

2016 absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-31799 of 2016 -2of the trial Court.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) November 28, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.