M/S Omaxe Limited And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another




    
     

   Date of decision: 15th September, 2015  M/s Omaxe Ltd. and others  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 $
%

#  Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Suresh Kumar, Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat submits that cancellation report is being filed in case registered by way of FIR No.300 dated 26.12.2011 under Sections 406/420/468/506 IPC at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat against the petitioners. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in spite of the repeated pass9overs and in view of the statement made by learned State counsel nothing survives in the RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   present petition and the same stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

 $
    $&'(&)*&+ ,%  ,
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court