State Bank Of Patiala v. Raj Kumar And ORS.

RSA-4403-2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (234) RSA-4403-2000 Date of Decision:-20.01.2026 State Bank of Patiala ......Appellant

Versus

Raj Kumar @ Rajinder Parshad and Others ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for the appellant.

None for respondent No.4.

Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 14.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

There is no represent on behalf of appellant. Despite sufficient opportunities, no steps have been taken by the appellant to pursue the present appeal. The appellant remained unrepresented on the last date of hearing i.e., 20.11.2025, and even today, no one has appeared on his behalf. 2.

In these circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period.

3.

It thus appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal.

4.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

-1SHUBHAM 2026.01.21 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

RSA-4403-2000 5.

However, liberty is granted to the appellant to seek revival/restoration of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for adjudication.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 20.01.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2SHUBHAM 2026.01.21 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order