Narender Aggarwal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 3202 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- May 18, 2018 Narender Aggarwal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Rajive Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. J.S. Bedi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sonpreet Brar, Advocate for the complainant. *** Status report filed.

Learned State counsel has submitted that local police has recommended cancellation of the F.I.R. in that way the petitioner is not required to be arrested in this case. He further submits that if as a result of further investigation or enquiry, the petitioner is required to be arrested in this case then the local police would give 7 days advance notice to him. In view of the statement made by the State counsel, the petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Passport of petitioner which had been surrendered before the local police be ordered to be returned to him. Learned State counsel states that it would be so done on petitioner approaching the local police and issuing necessary receipt. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE May 18, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.05.18 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh