Naresh And ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS
Date of decision: 8th December, 2015 Naresh and another Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others Respondents 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 5.
!"
# Report dated 28.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Lata, injured/witnesses namely Deepak, Dheraj and Saroj as well as the accused persons namely Naresh and Neeraj, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise Annexure7I has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.10 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties are co7villagers and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of heinous nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in $%&' %'() * +&+, -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1 "2# "1%3%'&4#2 and $5-46%'0,1 %'()&'0+),17* +&+, -'.&/ &'0&'+),1 8"# "1%3%'&4# !the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.38 dated 12.02.2015 registered at Police Station Sadar Ballabgarh, District Faridabad under Sections 354/452/323/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.
"
# ,9,3/,1:! RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.10 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court