Surjit Singh And Another v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (Punsup)
!"##" #
$%
&'(') * #
+ %, -!
./!
+/0 ./!
#
!
"
# !" - #
"
/ "
23
4 -
5
%#
6&/ 7 ) 5
%#
3 &/ 7 8) Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the impugned charge sheets
3&/ 7 8) were issued to the petitioners alleging loss on account of less storage gain during dispatch of stocks of wheat during crop year 2013-14 and is purportedly based upon instructions dated 26.10.2004 (Annexure P-1), which prescribe arbitrary norms for storage gain without any scientific basis. The issue of storage gain has already been conclusively examined by this Court in CWP-27725-2013, titled as Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Field Employees Union versus Union of India and others, decided on 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-6), and the
#$%%%$&'&( $&$ case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the ratio laid down therein. It is further submitted that the instructions dated 26.10.2004 (Annexure P-1) stand superseded by subsequent instructions dated 30.05.2022; however, the respondents are still relying upon the superseded instructions, rendering the impugned action arbitrary and unsustaina "
$
"
" #
# 0
#$)*++$&'&*, -./
.
-0, . "
.
9&/ 7 :)-
- 5
#
-
" 0
%
!
" # 6 ;
.+<=+
./!
# ##
"
# '(' "
% % % ##
0-
, > " !
#" 0#
#
#
6
- 7 0 %
-
0 " "
!
% " # 0
#
$ 9 4! -
!
.-
%% #
%
.
# #
""- 1
%#
3&/ 7 8)
05
>- !
.
# &)-"
" 0 - 2
#$%%%$&'&( $$
%
!
" # ! "
%'&'&(
#
, 2
?
2(
#
"
?
2(