Satyawan @ Satta v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-32066 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 06, 2016 Satyawan @ Satta
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr.Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Vikramjit Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the complainant.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.405 dated 07.11.2015 under Sections 302, 307, 323, 34 IPC and sections 25, 27 and 30 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Hansi, District Hisar. Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that no injury has been attributed to the Vineet Gulati 2016.12.08 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh present petitioner. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he
CRM No.M-32066 of 2016 -2grappled and raised lalkara. The statement of the complainant has already been recorded. Other two eye witnesses have been given up by learned Public Prosecutor.
The petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2015. He is not required for interrogation or investigation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. December 06, 2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2016.12.08 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh