High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32087/2016allowed

Saranjeet Kumar Bakshi & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ANR

2016-12-02Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

GAURAV ARORA 2016.12.05 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-32087 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-32087 of 2016 Date of decision : 02.12.2016 Saranjeet Kumar Bakshi & anr.

......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Reply filed by the State, is taken on record. Quashing of FIR No. 350 dated 27.07.2012 under Sections 406/498-A/506/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, Yamuna Nagar, is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 03.09.2016 (P-2) Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner on 10.05.2005. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. Two children were born out of this wedlock. The relationship between them became strained and thereafter, the F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of bringing less dowry and harassment caused by the petitioners.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, vide compromise deed dated 03.09.2016 (P-2).

Crl. Misc. No. M-32087 of 2016 In compliance of order dated 14.09.2016, report dated 19.10.2016 of Judl. Magistrate 1st Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari, has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of parties have been recorded. The complainant stated that the matter stands compromised between the parties and she does not want to proceed further against the accused and has no objection, if the present F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. To the same effect is the statements given by the petitioners. Consequently, in view of the status report dated 19.10.2016 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 350 dated 27.07.2012 under Sections 406/498-A/506/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, Yamuna Nagar, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

02.12.2016 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No