Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Chaudhary v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18378-2022 Date of Decision:-23.09.2022 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL CHAUDHARY ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent -.-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohinder Singh Joshi, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the complainant.
-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) The State counsel on instructions from SI Rajpal has submitted that as the petitioner has been arrested by the police, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Aforesaid fact has not been refuted by the counsel for the complainant.
Today none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above, present petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
( KARAMJIT SINGH) 23.09.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No PUNEET CHAWLA 2022.09.23 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment