Surjit Kaur v. Tehal Singh

RSA-2061-1999(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (210) RSA-2061-1999(O&M) Date of Decision:-27.01.2026 Surjit Kaur and Another ......Appellants

Versus

Tehal Singh and Others ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for appellant No.2.

Name of appellant No.1 already deleted vide order dated 27.09.2000.

None for respondents No.1 and 2.

Respondent No.3 stated to be died.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

There is no representation on behalf of appellant No.2 as well as respondents No.1 and 2. Despite sufficient opportunities, no steps have been taken by appellant No.2 to pursue the present appeal. The appellant remained unrepresented on the last two consecutive dates of hearing, i.e., 17.11.2025 and 11.07.2025, and even today, none has appeared on his behalf.

2.

In these circumstances, it is evident that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period.

-1SHUBHAM 2026.01.29 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

RSA-2061-1999(O&M) 3.

It thus appears that appellant No.2 is not interested in pursuing the present appeal.

4.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

5.

However, liberty is granted to appellant No.2 to seek revival/restoration of the appeal, in accordance with law, in case any worthwhile cause survives for adjudication.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 27.01.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2SHUBHAM 2026.01.29 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order